Malta may be a small island nation located just off the coast of Sicily, yet it is one of the most attractive technology hubs in the world. For ICOs, it is the perfect haven, as Malta promises a safe, secure, and transparent environment for crypto startups looking for a home to begin their operations. However, a recent test has shown that 61% of the country’s crypto agents are still not qualified to support this industry in a professional capacity.

In November 2017, the Maltese government announced the introduction of the Virtual Assets Act 2018 (VFA). This act entails compulsory training courses for those working as so-called “crypto agents” within the blockchain technologies sector. At the end of their training, all agents are required to pass an exam. Reports indicate that only one-third of those that took the test has actually passed.

The term ‘agents’ has been used to identify any practitioners that may be involved with any initial coin offering (ICO) or relaying information to and from the Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA). This means the testees were made up of highly skilled professionals, such as auditors, accountants, and lawyers.

61% Of Participants Have Reportedly Flunked The Test Despite Changes Made To Ease The Failure Rate

According to the Times Malta, two-thirds failed the cryptocurrency agent exam. Around 250 people were tested in an exam that used a multiple choice questioning format. After the results were handed over to the examiners, they soon realized that the negative style marking system that was in place was going to produce an incredibly low overall pass rate.

As a result, the examiners restructured the marking schematics of the test in an attempt to improve how many individuals pass the exam. In spite of their efforts, the eventual outcome was still quite poor, with only 39% of participants being awarded their crypto agent license.

IFSP Have So Far Declined To Give The Times Malta An Explanation

Marie Huillet from the Times Malta has said that there has been no forthcoming information on the matter from the Institute of Financial Service Practitioners (IFSP) exam coordinator. With the lack of transparency (from a nation that prides itself on a transparent crypto economy), this means that we can only speculate what may have gone wrong.

Now, as the term ‘agent’ refers to individuals (lawyers, accountants, auditors) that have presumably had to study very hard to become qualified within their profession, the question that springs to mind is this:

Could the high failure rate be due to the curriculum?

To become a lawyer, for example, the bar is no easy feat to achieve, so how are individuals so well versed in passing complicated tests failing?

The IFSP will need to look closely at how the training and the exam questions correlate. One thing we can be fairly certain of is that more training time is required for the 61% that failed.

On a positive note, if the training curriculum is sound, then it is good to see that the exams are not a doddle to pass. The conclusion then would be that the government is actively taking the necessary precautions to ensure anyone that falls under the Virtual Assets Act 2018 is being fully scrutinized and not just being given a free pass for the sake of promoting the country’s crypto friendly image.

Whatever the issue is, for a country that is touting itself as a crypto-secure and friendly safe haven for ICOs, this latest report does not do it justice. The IFSP obviously needs time to figure out what exactly has happened before being able to release an official statement.

My name is James Donaghue. I am an SEO freelance consultant and investor in blockchain technologies. I am a proud father, my hobbies include football (soccer), tennis, swimming, and cycling, and I also love travelling. Another hobby of mine is staying up to date with the financial markets - I used to work within the financial sector as an IT engineer setting up Reuters and Bloomberg market data feeds. During that time I learned a lot about the financial industry and came across the blockchain in its early conception. It wasn't until around 2015 I really started to take a keen interest in its development. Since then I have been studying the progress of the blockchain and investing in cryptocurrencies. I now contribute news, data, and reviews about ICOs, blockchain solutions, and cryptocurrencies regularly. I truly believe that disruptive blockchain tech will be an integral part of all of our futures. As such, I plan to continue following trends, breaking news, and the future development of blockchain solutions across all industries.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here